| Too many Yazids and no
Imam Husain in the Ummah today From The Crescent International 16th
March, 2003 In this month of Muharram, as Muslims all over the world
remember and mark the martyrdom of Imam Husain (ra) at Karbala, ZAFAR BANGASH,
Director of the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought, relates those events
to our current situation The real tragedy of the Ummah is not
that we are facing another Karbala in Iraq or Palestine today, but that there
are too many Yazids and no Imam Husain among us. During this Muharram, as in years
past, the sacrifices of the great Imam (ra) have been commemorated all over the
world; even rulers in some Muslim countries participate in ceremonies to pay tribute
to Imam Husains principled stand against injustice. Yet these very same rulers
not only compromise with injustice but perpetrate it in their own societies daily.
It is this hypocrisy that is at the root of much of the suffering of Muslims today.
In the Quran, Allah challenges us: "O you who have committed yourselves
to Allah, why do you say that which you do not practise? The worst thing in the
sight of Allah is that you say but do not do" (61:2-3). There
is a long list of tragedies that have befallen us that can be cited as our present-day
Karbalas: Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya, Kashmir, Bosnia and Gujrat are
but a few. Everywhere Muslims are under attack; they are vilified, tortured, humiliated
and killed, yet they are the ones accused of almost every kind of wrongdoing.
But before we draw parallels between the contemporary problems of Muslims and
the tragedy of Karbala, let us be clear about what Imam Husains sacrifice
was about. He did not struggle for worldly gain or power; he was aware that if
he gave in to the demands of Yazid, it would destroy Islam. He declared before
both friends and foes: "If this Ummah is to be tried with a shepherd such
as Yazid, then farewell to Islam." Imam Husain refused to give his allegiance
to Yazid but did not plot in secret; his rejection of Yazids authority was
open and aboveboard. He even went to Makkah to make a public declaration of what
was afoot and how it would affect the Ummah of Islam, but he realized that the
sanctity of the Haram would be violated by his blood being shed, so he left without
even completing his Hajj. For him, Islamic principles were more important than
his personal well being. He died in a strange land after witnessing the murders
of almost all his family and close companions; he preferred to die rather than
compromise with dhulm and oppression. When asked to give allegiance to Yazid and
save his life, he exclaimed: "A man like me cannot give allegiance to a man
like Yazid!" Such clarity of vision, purpose and commitment
are lacking in the Muslims of today; this mainly is what has led to our sorry
predicament. There is no shortage of sincere Muslims willing to make the hijrah
(migration to Allah), but there are no Imam Husains to lead them. The Muslim world
is dominated by Yazids who have pledged themselves to the modern-day Pharaohs.
Today, Ghazzah is drenched with the blood of children as the sand of Karbala was
nearly 1,400 years ago; the children of Iraq are starving as the children and
grandchildren of Imam Husain starved at Karbala. Todays situation is made worse
by the fact that an external power the US has emerged that has no respect for
others rights or lives. Greed, arrogance and the belief that nothing can resist
its military might are driving Washington to force everyone to submit to its demands.
The Qaroons and Pharaohs of yesteryear demanded no less, visiting untold misery
upon countless souls until they themselves perished, as they were destined to. The
struggle between right and wrong is as old as human history. When Iblis refused
to obey Allãhs command to prostrate before Adam (as), the struggle
between obedience and defiance came out into the open. Muslims would do well to
remember that Iblis was not a mushrik; it was his arrogance and feeling of superiority
because he was made of fire while Adam was made of clay that led him to disobey
Allah. How many rulers in the Muslim world today are following in the footsteps
of Iblis? True, they are Muslims in name and in some of their rituals and gestures,
but in reality they belong to the camp of Iblis. The same struggle between Haqq
and batil manifested itself between Ibrahim (as) and Qaroon; between Musa (as)
and the Pharaoh; and between the last and final Prophet of Allah (saw) and the
chiefs of Quraish. The stage may change, but the nature of the struggle does not.
And in most situations, while falsehood is initially successful and able to browbeat
many ordinary people into submission, truth ultimately triumphs. Yazid and his
men were militarily successful at Karbala, but how many Muslims celebrate his
"triumph" today? Which Muslim in his right mind can say that Yazid was
in the right? Imam Husain (ra) died, but ultimate victory was his. By refusing
to surrender to Yazid, he made it difficult or impossible for future tyrants to
justify their illegitimate rule by Islam. Unfortunately, successive
rulers in Islamic history have deviated from the norms established by Allãhs
Messenger (saw) and his rightly guided successors (ra). Many a scholar succumbed
to pressure from these rulers and provided intellectual arguments to underpin
questionable policies and practices. We Muslims are in such bad shape today because
we have allowed too many compromises to creep into the body politic of Islam.
One of these, which has achieved the status of religious dogma, is the idea that
Muslims must not rebel against authority, even if it is illegitimate, because
to do so might lead to turmoil in society. This argument received immense official
patronage, and scholars who promoted it were rewarded with positions and titles.
Those who refused to cooperate, such as Imam Abu-Hanifa (ra), were publicly punished
and humiliated. Thus the deviation of Muslim rulers kings who insisted on being
called khalifah or amir al-mumineen was given religious sanction by scholars
of dubious credentials and not enough courage or conviction. Under official patronage,
their line of reasoning received wide currency and gradually became accepted as
standard practice. Such corruption at the core was bound to affect the Muslim
Ummah profoundly. Its consequences are being felt by Muslims everywhere today.
Other demonic notions also find striking echoes in the past. The US and
its Zionist cohorts talk about such ideas as "pre-emptive strikes."
The Zionists have even put them into practice, in Palestine and elsewhere. In
the Qur'an Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala tells us that Pharaoh issued orders to kill
all the male children of Bani Israel and spare the girls (28:4-5). He gave this
order because his advisors told him that someone from among the Children of Israel
would emerge to challenge his authority, which would ultimately lead to the destruction
of his kingdom. Pharaohs order was a "pre-emptive" strike against
Bani Israel to prevent that eventuality. We know from the Quran that a boy-child
from the Bani Israel Musa (as) not only emerged to challenge Pharaoh, but that
Allah arranged matters in such a way that he was brought up in the house of Pharaoh
himself! Those who call themselves the Bani Israel today have abandoned their
covenant with Allah and adopted the practices of Pharaoh. So can their ultimate
fate be any different? But before such a fate befalls them, a Musa-like leader
must emerge in the world. Musa (as) did not have armies to confront Pharaohs
legions; he was not even very articulate, having some sort of speech impediment
(Quran 20:27), yet he received the divine message and obeyed Allãhs
command that he deliver it without fear or hesitation. There is
another irony in the doctrine of "pre-emptive strikes." Only half a
century ago, Hitler used precisely this doctrine to invade and occupy a number
of countries in Europe. When Israel was planted in the heartland of Islam, it
adopted the same ideology and has pursued it relentlessly against the Palestinians
and against neighbouring states. And now US president George Bush has adopted
it, adding further refinements to justify his lust for aggression and war. He
has done more; by presenting a simplistic yet dangerous notion that if one is
not with him, then one is with his enemy he has usurped peoples right to
decide for themselves. In a sense he has indeed established a global dictatorship.
Berating others lack of fairness and decency, however, will not help the
Muslims. There is little doubt in the mind of most Muslims that America, Israel,
India et al are not ruled by people and systems that wish Muslims well; they are
the open enemies of Islam, so why should Muslims expect any else from them? Equally
crucial are other questions: what are we Muslims doing to confront our enemies?
What weaknesses must we overcome in Muslim societies in order for us not to expose
ourselves to external threats and aggression? Let us be clear that there are many
structural weaknesses and faults in Muslim societies; denial of this will not
help us, only our enemies. Accepting that problems exist is the first step on
the path to their solution: someone suffering from a heart-problem can hardly
help himself by denying that he has any such disease. Imam Husain
(ra) had correctly diagnosed the problem confronting the Ummah in his time. It
was a question of illegitimacy and the usurpation of power and authority by people
who were totally unfitted to rule. He raised his voice against it; regrettably,
there were not enough Muslims willing to give up their lives for Islams principles.
Even those who did join the Imam eventually betrayed him. Yet this does not detract
from his principled stand and his willingness to give up his own life in order
not to lend weight to the corruption of Islamic principles. He was acting according
to the Quranic command: "O you who have committed yourselves to Allah:
shall I tell you of a deal that will save you from the torment of Hellfire? Believe
in Allah and His Messenger, and struggle in the way of Allah with your wealth
and with your lives. That is better for you, if you but knew" (61:10-11).
So Imam Husain (ra) struggled in the way of Allah not only with his own life but
those of his family and close friends as well. Today their voices
echo in the torture-chambers of prisons in Israel, in the cages in Guantanamo
Bay, in the valleys and mountains of Afghanistan, in the blood-drenched streets
of Kashmir and the sewage-soiled alleys and side streets of Palestinian refugee-camps
and Iraqi cities and towns. To these must be added the torture-chambers of such
rulers as those of Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Tunisia. The Muslim
world is ruled by the likes of Yazid, who have allied themselves with the enemies
of Islam. Yet these very rulers dare to extol the virtues of Imam Husain (ra)
while themselves indulging in Yazidi behaviour. All this causes despondency
among some Muslims; yet this is wrong. Allah does not allow Muslims to lose hope;
there will definitely be trials, tribulations, even suffering, and defeat, in
the struggle for truth and justice. After all, even the Messenger of Allah (saw)
did not have an easy time. He was known as al-Amin, "the trustworthy one",
even by his enemies, yet they persecuted him and his companions. They suffered
abuse, torment, exile, siege, isolation and even death in battle or by torture,
yet they remained steadfast. Even when permitted to fight they did not always
win: in the battle of Uhud Muslims suffered a setback despite the presence of
the Prophet (saw); a similar fate nearly befell them at the battle of Hunayn,
before the Prophet (saw) was able to rally and regroup his companions. So there
is no guarantee for Muslims. What is important is that we struggle in the way
of Allah with total sincerity. That is why Allah tells His faithful servants
not to lose heart, for Allah is with those who struggle in His way. We are commanded
to fight; in the process some of us will kill and be killed, but ultimately the
reward of those who do so is with Allah because He has bought their wealth and
lives in exchange for the Promise of Paradise (9:111). For Allãhs
Promise is of course the best of all promises. |